I'm often amazed at
our lack of knowledge about history. Ordinary people are hungry for this
information, yet the organizations responsible to disseminate these facts seem
to have an agenda to keep us in the dark. This is especially true when it comes
to our ancient human history.
I won't hold you in
suspense with this article: The Ark of Noah has been found. It's real. I'll
describe the evidence in some detail and end with the historical and religious
implications.
How It Was Discovered
In 1959, Turkish army
captain Llhan Durupinar discovered an unusual shape while examining aerial
photographs of his country. The smooth shape, larger than a football field,
stood out from the rough and rocky terrain at an altitude of 6,300 feet near
the Turkish border with Iran.
Capt. Durupinar was
familiar with the biblical accounts of the Ark and its association with Mount
Ararat in Turkey, but he was reluctant to jump to any conclusions. The region
was very remote, yet it was inhabited with small villages. No previous reports
of an object this odd had been made before. So he forwarded the photographic
negative to a famous aerial photography expert named Dr. Brandenburger, at Ohio
State University.
Brandenburger was
responsible for discovering the Cuban missile bases during the Kennedy era from
reconnaissance photos, and after carefully studying the photo, he concluded:
"I have no doubt at all, that this object is a ship. In my entire career,
I have never seen an object like this on a stereo photo."
In 1960 the picture [above] was published in LIFE magazine under the
heading of Noahs Ark? That
same year a group of Americans accompanied Capt. Durupinar to the site for a
day and a half. They were expecting to find artifacts on the surface or
something that would be unquestionably related to a ship of some kind. They did
some digging in the area but found nothing conclusive and announced to the
anxiously waiting world that it appeared to be a natural formation.
Most of the global
media turned away from the find and it became a non-story.
In 1977 Ron Wyatt
visited the site. Obtaining official permission, Ron and others conducted more
thorough research over a period of several years. They used metal detection
surveys, subsurface radar scans, and chemical analysis -- real science -- and
their findings were startling. The evidence was undeniable. This was the Ark of
Noah.
The Visual Evidence
The first part of the
survey was to examine the object and take its measurements. The shape looked
like hull of a ship. One end was pointed as you would expect from bow [below: D] and the opposite end was blunt like a stern.
The distance from bow to stern was 515 feet, or exactly 300 Egyptian cubits.
The average width was 50 cubits. These were the exact measurements mentioned in
the Bible.
On the starboard side
(right) near the stern there were four vertical bulges protruding from the mud
[B], at regular intervals, that were determined
to be the "ribs" of the hull [see below]. Opposite to these, on the port side, a single rib [A] protrudes from the mud. You can see its
curved shape very clearly. Surrounding it are more ribs, still largely buried
in the mud, but visible upon close examination.
Remember that this
object, if it is the Ark, is extremely old. The wood has been petrified.
Organic matter has been replaced by minerals from the earth. Only the shapes
and traces of the original wood remain. Perhaps this is why the expedition in
1960 was disappointed. They anticipated finding and retrieving chucks of wood,
long since eroded.
From the position of
the object in the middle of an obvious mud flow, it is obvious that the object
slid down more than a mile from its original location. Geologists believe it
was originally over 1000 feet higher in the mountain and encased in a shell of hardened
mud. They think that an earthquake in 1948 cracked the mud shell and revealed
the structure. This is confirmed by stories from the surrounding villagers who
tell of its "sudden appearance" around that time.
Biblical accounts of
the Ark describe it as having as many as six levels. The assumed shape of the
Ark seems consistent with the bulge [C] in the middle of the object. In fact, as we will soon learn,
radar scans of the structure suggest that this bulge is the collapsed debris of
these levels.
Although most people
think of the Ark as being rectangular, that only applies to the top decks. The
sleek shape of the hull is necessary to enable the huge ship to remain stable
in the water and survive tremendous waves.
Ground Penetrating Radar
The human eye needs to
see reflected light to recognize an object. To visualize what remains below the
earth, scientists use microwaves which can penetrate the ground and bounce back
when they hit something solid. This technique is commonly used to locate oil
and other minerals. Called Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), the apparatus us
made from an antenna that transmits, then listens to receive the
"echo" and prints the result on a piece of paper. The delay and
strength of this echo tell the geologists how solid and at what depth the
objects are under the earth.
The team of geologists
didn't scan the entire object. Instead, they marked out lines that crossed the
object with yellow tape. Then they dragged the antenna (about the size of a lawnmower)
over the lines and watched the output on the paper recorder. When they got a
strong "hit" -- meaning there was something solid underneath -- they
would record the position on the tape [above]. Later, when they made a map of the object, the tape and the
location of the "hits" they realized that there was indeed a
structure underneath the mud.
The radar cans
revealed this structure [above] under the mud. The
symmetry and logical placement of these objects shows that this is unmistakably
a man made structure, most likely the Ark of Noah.
Artifacts Retrieved From The Ark
Using the GPR, Ron
Wyatt discovered an open cavity on the starboard side. He used an improvised drill
to make core sample inside this cavity and retrieved several very interesting
objects. Below you can see the artifacts which were sent for laboratory
analysis. On the left is the bore hole [see below], followed by what turned out to be petrified animal dung, then
a petrified antler and lastly a piece of cat hair.
Perhaps the most
significant find from the Ark itself is a piece of petrified wood. When this
was first found it appeared to be a large beam. But upon closer examination it
is actually three pieces of plank that have been laminated together with some
kind of organic glue! This is the same technology used in modern plywood.
Lamination makes the total strength of the wood much greater than the combined
strength of the pieces. This suggests a knowledge of construction far beyond
anything we knew existed in the ancient world.
Examination reveals
the glue oozed from the layers. The outside of the wood appears to have been
coated with bitumen.
Even more surprising
were laboratory analyses which not only revealed that the petrified wood
contained carbon (proving it was once wood) but there were iron nails [above right] embedded in the wood!
We like to imagine
that humanity evolved in a neat sequence of eras, each named after the
technology that was discovered. We have the Stone Age (where man developed
arrows and stone tools), the Bronze Age (where metals were combined and heated
to make tools and household items) and lastly the Iron Age (where iron and
steel objects were made by heating iron ore and adding other material -- like
charcoal -- to strengthen it). The Iron Age is usually placed at 1200-1000 BC,
yet we have iron nails being used in this extremely old construction
But Wait... There's More!
The most surprising
find was discovered with sensitive metal detectors. The team located several
strong "hits" that, when dug up, revealed large disc shaped rivets.
From simple observation of the metal it was possible to see where the rivet had
been hammered after being inserted through a hole [below].
If rivets being used
in ancient construction doesn't impress you, this surely will.
An analysis of the
metal used to make the rivets revealed that they were a combination of iron
(8.38%), aluminum (8.35%) and titanium (1.59%). Remember these trace metals
have survived petrification and so do not indicate the exact content in the
original material. (see Report from Galbraith Labs)
We know the aluminum
was incorporated in the metallic mixture because it does not exist in metallic
form in nature. This implies an extremely advanced knowledge of metallurgy and
engineering. Characteristics of an iron-aluminum alloy have been investigated
in The Russian Chemical Bulletin (2005)
and reveal that this alloy forms a thin film of aluminum oxide which protects
the material from rust and corrosion. The addition of titanium would provide
added strength. This seems to have worked. The rivets have survived from
antiquity!
The Surrounding Areas
Several miles from the
location of the Ark, huge stones were discovered, some standing upright while
others lying on the ground. These stones, weighing many tons, have holes carved
in them. Scientists have determined that they were anchors and the holes would
have been their attachment to a ship with hemp rope.
Often these stones
will have crosses carved in them, from centuries ago when pilgrims made the
journey to visit the Ark. Yes, the Ark was well known in the Middle Ages and
even before. And its location was recorded in many historical documents.
"And the Ark
rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the
mountains of Ararat. And the waters decreased continually until the tenth
month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the
mountains seen." - Genesis 8:4-5
The Gilgamesh Epic
(650 BC) gives Mt. Nisir as the landing place of the Ark. The local name for
the town where the Ark was found is Nasar.
The annals of
Ashurnasurpal II of Assyria (833-859 BC) places it south of the Zab river
(correct).
Theophilus of Antioch
(115-185 AD) said the Ark could be seen in his day in the Arabian mountains.
Later Church Fathers also mention the Ark as late as the mid 7th century.
In the 13th century,
Willam, a traveler, stated for the first time that Mt. Masis was the Ark
location (present-day Mt. Ararat).
Ptolemy's Geographia
(1548) mentions the mountains of Armenia as the place of landing. So does the
traveler Nicolas de Nicolay (1558).
Pilgrims to the site
would gather bits and pieces of the petrified wood which would be used as
charms to ward off evil. When they encountered the anchors, they had no doubt
about their association with the Ark. They often carved one big cross to
represent Noah and smaller crosses representing his family.
The huge anchors would
have been suspended from the keel of the ship. This was a common practice among
ancient mariners to stabilize a heavy ship and ensure that the bow is always
facing the on-coming waves. A "top heavy" ship, such as the Ark,
could easily be capsized by a wave approaching from the side. This is yet
further proof that Noah's Ark was a reality and that it has indeed been found
in Turkey.
Source: http://www.sunnyskyz.com/